Platform

One execution record. Three connected capabilities.

JeraViz is built around a single record of what your agents did. Trace is the first product. Guard and Eval will use the same projects, keys, telemetry and workspace, and are labelled as roadmap until they exist.

Flagship product · Launch scope

JeraViz Trace

The flagship product and the first release. It captures every execution as a trace and gives engineers the views to understand it.

  • Distributed agent execution tracing
  • End-to-end execution timelines
  • Tool-call and model-request inspection
  • Token, cost and latency analytics
  • Execution history and search
  • Agent-to-agent visibility (graph view planned)
tr_8f3a216.42 s12 spans3 agents
  • ticket-resolution
  • triage-agent
  • classify-ticket
  • retrieval-agent
  • vector_search
  • kb_lookup
  • synthesize-context
  • refund-agent
  • plan-refund
  • orders_api.get_order
  • payments_api.create_refund
  • compose-reply
Illustrative data

Connected capability · Roadmap

JeraViz Guard

Planned. Governs what agents are allowed to do, using the same workspace and telemetry as Trace. Not available and not designed in detail yet.

  • Agent permissions and access policies
  • Tool execution controls
  • Human approval workflows
  • Risk-based execution policies
  • Policy violation alerts and audit trails

Not available · direction only

Guard would evaluate each tool call against policies and record the decision as an event on the same trace, so the audit trail and the execution record are one dataset.

No screens are shown because none have been built. Scope, scoring methods and release timing are not decided.

Get notified about early access

Connected capability · Roadmap

JeraViz Eval

Planned. Turns recorded executions into test cases and measures quality over time. Direction only: scoring methods have not been chosen.

  • Scenario-based testing and evaluation datasets
  • Execution quality scoring
  • Regression testing before deployment
  • Benchmark comparisons and reliability reports

Not available · direction only

Eval would let you save a recorded execution as a test case, run a dataset against two agent versions and compare results, using the same traces you already inspect.

No screens are shown because none have been built. Scope, scoring methods and release timing are not decided.

Get notified about early access

Data model

What Trace captures.

Everything is a span in a trace; an execution is one run. Choose how much text is stored with a capture mode.

Captured fields by record type
RecordFieldsNote
Executionname, status, start and end, duration, tags, optional session idAll plans
Spankind, name, parent, start, duration, status, attributesAll plans
Model requestmodel, provider, input and output tokens, finish reason, optional prompt and response textText depends on capture mode
Tool calltool name, optional arguments and result, retries, error categoryPayload depends on capture mode
Eventtimestamp, type (exception, retry, log), attributesAll plans

Capture modes (per project)

Full
Stores prompts, responses, tool arguments and results (subject to size limits and redaction rules).
Metadata only
Stores timing, status, tokens and names, but no payload text. Recommended for sensitive workloads.
Hashed payloads
Stores a hash of each payload so identical inputs can be recognized without storing the text.

Designed for isolation, auditability and scale.

The proposed data flow and the principles behind it. Statuses are explicit: these are design principles for the first release, not audited controls.

  1. 01AI ApplicationSDK or OpenTelemetry exporter
  2. 02Telemetry IngestionAuthenticated, validated, rate-limited
  3. 03Event ProcessingNormalize, price tokens, apply privacy rules
  4. 04Trace StorageColumnar event store + object storage
  5. 05AnalyticsRollups, percentiles, cost
  6. 06JeraViz DashboardExplorer, timeline, analytics
Proposed architecture. Illustrative diagram, not a description of a running system.
  • Secure data transmission

    Launch scope

    TLS for public endpoints; project-scoped API keys on ingestion.

    By design

  • Workspace isolation

    Launch scope

    Every record is scoped to a workspace; enforced in application code and database policy, and tested.

    By design

  • Access controls

    Launch scope

    Role-based access at workspace level (owner, admin, developer, viewer).

    By design

  • Encryption

    Launch scope

    Encryption at rest with managed keys for databases, object storage and queues.

    By design

  • Auditability

    Planned

    Administrative actions are recorded from the start; a user-facing audit log follows.

    Recording at launch, UI planned

  • Data retention

    Launch scope

    Retention set by plan; deletion on request; per-project capture modes limit what is stored.

    Per-project retention planned

Release status

What is planned, in order.

No dates are promised. Order reflects dependencies: later phases build on the data captured by earlier ones.

  1. Phase 1

    Foundation

    Launch scope
    • Authentication, workspaces, projects, API keys
    • Event ingestion (SDK and OTLP)
    • Trace explorer and execution details
    • Core analytics: volume, latency, tokens, cost
  2. Phase 2

    Observability

    Planned
    • Advanced filtering and saved views
    • Agent execution graph
    • Tool-call, model-request and error views
    • Alerts, SDK and framework expansion
  3. Phase 3

    Intelligence

    Roadmap
    • Advanced analytics and comparisons
    • Evaluation datasets and runs
    • Regression testing
    • Agent performance comparisons
  4. Phase 4

    Governance

    Roadmap
    • Permission controls and policy engine
    • Human approval workflows
    • Enterprise audit capabilities

Build agents with visibility. Operate them with confidence.

Understand what your agents do, identify what needs improvement and build more reliable AI systems with JeraViz.

JeraViz Trace is in development. Sign-up is not open yet; the early-access page explains where things stand.